Identity politics is a powerful force in modern political discourse, shaping how individuals align themselves with candidates, parties, and movements. At its core, identity politics revolves around the idea that people’s political beliefs and affiliations are heavily influenced by aspects of their identity—such as race, gender, religion, and sexual orientation. This phenomenon has deep psychological underpinnings.
First, social identity theory explains how people categorize themselves and others into groups. These groups, or “in-groups,” become central to an individual’s sense of self, leading to loyalty to their group and, often, hostility toward “out-groups.” In politics, this results in voters supporting candidates or policies that favor their group identity, even if it means sacrificing broader interests. The stronger the identification with a group, the more likely individuals are to act in accordance with what benefits that group, regardless of objective policy outcomes.
Confirmation bias plays a crucial role in identity politics. Once individuals identify with a particular group, they tend to seek out information that reinforces their beliefs and ignore information that challenges their worldview. This makes it difficult for political opponents to engage in meaningful dialogue or change voters’ minds. People are not just defending political ideas—they are defending their sense of self.
Emotional manipulation also contributes to the rise of identity politics. Politicians often use emotional appeals to solidify group loyalty. Fear, anger, and hope are commonly used to rally supporters and deepen divisions between groups. For instance, fear-based messaging may emphasize threats to the group, whether real or perceived, creating a sense of urgency that overrides logical reasoning. Hope-based messaging, on the other hand, can inspire a strong sense of collective purpose.
READ MORE: Donald Trump: A Psychological Profile
Groupthink is another psychological mechanism at play. Within identity-based political movements, dissent is often discouraged, leading to an environment where members conform to the dominant views of the group. This stifles debate and reinforces extreme positions, as individuals fear being ostracized if they question the group’s narrative. Social media has amplified this phenomenon by creating echo chambers, where opposing views are filtered out, and only group-approved perspectives are reinforced.
Cognitive dissonance further entrenches identity politics. When faced with conflicting information or policies that don’t fully align with their group’s beliefs, individuals experience discomfort. Rather than adjusting their views, they often double down on their group’s position to avoid this internal conflict. This is why voters may continue to support a candidate or movement even when it contradicts their personal interests.
Lastly, moral absolutism plays a significant role in identity politics. People tend to view their group’s beliefs as morally superior, leading to the demonization of opposing groups. This “us versus them” mentality makes compromise nearly impossible, as opposing views are not just seen as different but as morally wrong.
READ MORE: Understanding Psychology from A to Z
In summary, identity politics is driven by deep-seated psychological mechanisms: social identity theory, confirmation bias, emotional manipulation, groupthink, cognitive dissonance, and moral absolutism. Together, these factors create a potent political environment where group identity often supersedes policy debate, complicating the pursuit of common ground in modern politics.
Now watch a short animation video about identity politics:
